Aug 11, Kathmandu - Senior cabin crew members Prijita Karki and Sirjana K.C. of Nepal Airlines have submitted a complaint to the National Human Rights Commission, alleging gender discrimination, psychological abuse, and misconduct at their workplace. The duo claims that their fundamental rights are being violated following their suspension from duty amid ongoing legal proceedings.

The complaint states that their retrenchment occurred before the Supreme Court delivered its full verdict, citing the cancellation of their writ petitions as the reason. Karki and K.C. argue that they have been denied their rights without proper legal justification, especially as the full text of the Supreme Court's decision has not yet been released.

They further allege that despite the Labour Court's orders for their reinstatement, Nepal Airlines abruptly removed them from duty without proper notice, which they say is a clear violation of their constitutional rights and human rights. They report that their service has not only been disrupted but that they have also faced daily humiliation and abuse within the workplace.

The cabin crew members have expressed their hope that the Human Rights Commission will conduct an impartial investigation into their allegations. They have highlighted ongoing discriminatory behavior within the airline, including legal and institutional efforts to voice their concerns.

Karki and K.C., both senior cabin crew members, state that although airline regulations permit crew members to serve until the age of 50, they were retired last year. Following their retirement, Karki sought justice through the Labour Court, which ordered her reinstatement, while K.C.’s employment was temporarily restored through an interim order. Both received official documents for their reinstatement, but Nepal Airlines did not appeal the Labour Court's verdict in the Supreme Court.

Their complaint also raises concerns over the age limit policy for cabin crew, which they argue is discriminatory and violates human rights and gender equality principles. They point out that most cabin crew are hired on contractual basis and that the age cap of 45 years is unfair, especially considering the critical safety responsibilities of their role.

The duo emphasizes that their fight is not only for personal justice but also for the rights of other cabin crew members facing similar discrimination. They have been vocal against workplace harassment, psychological abuse, and unclear policies related to service conditions and age limits, advocating for amendments to the current regulations.

They have urged the Human Rights Commission to treat their case seriously and conduct a swift investigation into the alleged violations. They request that necessary action be taken against those found responsible and that their right to work is protected and upheld.